Sorry, but I think the text is understandable. It's true, you can't read the last letter because of the texture, I used. But you can read it. The text is: I continue to love you, and never let you go. I showed the graphic several people and everyone could read it. :)
Sorry, but this is just your view of the "Banner". Many people are don't have any problems with the banner. And even when you are thinking, that a graphic loses the power, it is (like I said) your view. Other people are not having problems with reading the texture.
And yes, like I said it before, it was on purpose. :)
So, I hope everything is clear now. I don't think we have to start a discussion about a graphic, right? ;)
Yes, this is my opinion, as someone who is also a graphic artist. If you post something for a challenge, you can expect viewers to ask questions as to your intent, I for one, am grateful when someone takes the time to review my work, it means they are taking me seriously as an artist.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-22 09:56 pm (UTC)I showed the graphic several people and everyone could read it. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-23 12:11 am (UTC)There is a letter past the o in the last sentence, is this an a for the word away? is it another g?
You've also kerned and tracked the text so it reads as a mass and not as two separate thoughts.
The squiggle lines at the bottom are also ambiguous, as they could read as a signature of some sort.
If a viewer has to struggle to understand an image, even for a half-second, then as a graphic work, it loses it's power.
I was merely asking if these particular choices were intentional. And, as you have told me they are, that's all I need to know.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-23 04:10 pm (UTC)Other people are not having problems with reading the texture.
And yes, like I said it before, it was on purpose. :)
So, I hope everything is clear now. I don't think we have to start a discussion about a graphic, right? ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-24 01:17 pm (UTC)